NewtonDogs
Articles, Commentaries, and Letters

Home | About Us | News | Off-Leash | Info | Contact Us | Site Map

 

Home

About Us

News

Off-Leash

Info

Contact Us

Site Map

Articles

Below are articles or links to articles related to current dog issues or information:

Dog owners ought to have a right to public spaces

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_colnedorfman01142003.htm

As one of the neighbors who participates in the "puppy playground" group interviewed for Matthew Call's recent article on dogs, I appreciate your supportive article, but would like to correct a few pieces of misleading information.

We do not see ourselves as a "splinter cell," clique, or organization ("puppy playground" is a term coined by the reporter), nor do we believe that by walking our dogs off leash we are trying to further our own agenda, and we do not consider that we have a mission.

We are no different than the majority of Newton dog owners, or dog owners throughout urban and suburban America for that matter. We are simply trying to find a pleasant and enjoyable way to meet the most basic recreational needs of our devoted companion animals.

Everyday throughout Newton, dog owners use public places, always illegally, where they can enjoy basic fundamental activities with their canine friends, such as throwing a ball or Frisbee, or watching their companions enjoy wrestling, chasing, or roughhousing with another dog. These few minutes a day make for happier, healthier, friendlier, better socialized dogs, and for most are a critical component of responsible dog ownership.

Unfortunately, this activity, which builds community by bringing neighbors and their pets together on a daily basis, is illegal. While the city of Newton provides over 400 acres of space for residents who want to throw, hit, kick, bat or otherwise interact with balls, the city provides no legal space at all for residents who prefer to play with dogs instead of balls. Allowing residents to utilize public spaces for recreation with their dogs is no less reasonable than creating parks for residents to play with baseballs, soccer balls, tennis balls, golf balls, etc.

Legal or not, Newton residents are utilizing public spaces to recreate with their dogs. Dog owners gather early in the morning at almost every playground, park, field, meadow, woods, and open space in Newton. They go alone and they gather in groups. They throw balls, pick up after their pets, make friends, drink coffee, share joys, provide support in difficult times, and regularly receive $25 dollar tickets for breaking the law.

The city estimates that there are at least as many households with dogs in Newton as there are families with children, and yet city policy treats residents who own dogs as pariahs. Dog owners receive no services in exchange for the $25 annual dog license fee, and regular attempts are made to scare them away from using often underutilized public spaces by sending police to ticket offenders. We hope that the city will review it's policy on dogs off leash and find a way to make it possible for residents not to have to choose between being good dog owners and law abiding citizens.

Ann Dorfman is a resident of West Newton.

NewtonDogs organization formed

NewtonDogs, a local organization for Newton dog owners, has recently been formed. The group will strive to keep the Newton community up to date on canine related events, rules and legal issues, responsible pet and owner behavior, and other related topics. After its initial three organizational meetings, the group's focus is on seeking change in the leash laws to provide off-leash times and places for Newton residents to play responsibly with their dogs.

A public hearing on this topic will take place before the Aldermanic Programs and Services Committee on Wednesday, Dec. 3, at 7:45 p.m. at Newton City Hall. Invited to attend the public hearing and describe their experiences with off-leash programs are Brookline Parks and Recreation Director Bob Lynch and Commissioner Nancy O'Connor to discuss their pilot program in 13 parks, Cambridge Fresh Pond Park Ranger Jean Rogers, Wellesley Animal Control Officer Sue Webb, and Becky Siebens, the Trustees of Reservations Operations Manager for Rocky Woods Reservation in Medfield who will describe the reservation's Greendogs off-leash permit program.

For more information on NewtonDogs, please contact Ann Dorfman, 617-244-9321 or Ted Kuklinski, 617-969-6222, send an e-mail to newtondogs@yahoo.com or visit their newly established Web site at www.newtondogs.org.

Can Parks and Dogs Coexist?

A Hearing on December 3 Asks for Comments

by Doug Dickson
Newton Conservators Newsletter, November/December 2003

The Newton Conservators has worked for over 40 years to protect open space for the benefit of citizens, who visit our parks and conservation areas for fitness, recreation and inspiration, as well as wildlife, who depend on these areas for their survival. But what about Fido—is there also room in our parks for dogs? Do they have a right to exercise their legs and lungs in our public open spaces? If so, under what conditions?

This will be the topic of a hearing to be held by the Programs and Services Committee of the Board of Aldermen on Tuesday, December 3 at 7:45 PM at Newton City Hall. Alderman Marcia Johnson, who chairs this committee, has worked for several years with Alderman Christine Samuelson and other aldermen and community activists to craft a reasonable compromise that would enable dogs to use selected parks and conservation areas in a way that respects the rights of other users.

As matters stand currently, dogs are allowed in these places only when leashed. Dogs running free are technically in violation of the city’s leash law—and if you visit most any of our parks on mornings, evenings and weekend days, you’ll find lots of dog owners who disregard this ordinance.

These folks defend their behavior by describing the enjoyment they get from playing with their dogs in a place large enough for their dogs to run, to interact with other dogs and to get the exercise the animals need for good health.

People who oppose dogs off-leash in our parks cite the failure of owners to control their animals, allowing then to jump up on or threaten children, the elderly and other dogs. They also talk about unsanitary conditions created by owners who don’t clean up after their animals.

The lines are drawn in a seemingly intractable way. How can the interests of dog owners and those who oppose their use of public spaces be reconciled? One solution is to create dedicated dog parks throughout the city. These would be fenced areas within existing open spaces reserved for dogs and their owners. This idea would separate dogs from other park users, but would remove large amounts of open space from use for other purposes. It would also introduce further fragmentation of these facilities and more of the already abundant chain link fencing.

Are fences needed to create dog parks? San Francisco and other cities across the country have designated areas of parks for use by dogs without fencing, relying on owners to keep their dogs within certain zones during certain hours. These restrictions are posted so other users can plan their activities accordingly. Plastic bags are provided to encourage owners to pick up after their animals.

The Trustees of Reservations has a demonstration project—called the Green Dog program—in place at two of its sites. Dog owners are required to purchase a tag (which comes free of charge to members for up to two dogs) that permits use of the facilities for a day or as long as a year. The dog and the owner must wear the tag to show they are authorized users. Rules require owners to keep their dogs within the bounds of designated areas, control their animals when others are in the vicinity, clean up after defecation, and immediately leash unruly dogs. Volunteers and staff monitor and enforce these policies. Proceeds from the sale of tags cover the costs of the program, which includes supplies of plastic bags, training of volunteer monitors, and paid staff to manage the project.

It’s probably not possible and certainly impractical to hold dogs and their owners to the strict leash law now on the books. But finding a solution has not been easy and will continue to challenge those on all sides of the issue. But there are some models we can learn from to craft our own local response to the legitimate interests of people, pets and wildlife. If, like many others, you hold strong opinions on this matter, take a moment to voice your comments and suggestions, either at the hearing on December 3 or by contacting Marcia Johnson (mjohnson@ci.newton.ma.us).

Doug Dickson is the editor of the Newton Conservators newsletter and a former president.  He also sits on the Community Preservation Committee.

Dogs and trees

By Doug Dickson / Special To The Tab

Tuesday, December 9, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/local_regional/new_feaneenvtrees12092003.htm

Most of us have had some experience with dog urine on lawns - a brown spot surrounded by a super-green area of grass growing faster than the rest of the lawn. Dog urine is high in nitrogen and the brown area has overdosed on nitrogen and the surrounding green grass is thriving on it. Dog urine is also highly acidic and repeated urination on an area by dogs can change the pH of the soil.

Both of these problems apply to trees and other plants, as well as to turf grasses. The feeding roots of trees are close to the surface and take in whatever is soaked into the soil. Habitual urination in the root zone of a tree will, over time, have the same detrimental effect as on grass. Further, the bark on many trees, especially young ones, can be weakened or eaten through by the acid in dog urine. This exposes trees to diseases and insect damage that healthy bark is designed to block.

Trees located along streets and in parks where dogs congregate are particularly vulnerable to this "over-watering." Male dogs are especially likely to urinate on trees (or other upright objects), but it is common for both males and females of the species to "mark" trees and objects with urine. A tree that is "marked" frequently will suffer damage. Evidence of damage is a bleached effect on the lower part of the trunk, notably visible on young or thin-barked trees.

A park in Seattle experienced a sudden decline in all of its trees after dogs were allowed to run off-leash as part of a pilot program. Examination by a team of arborists identified a clear cause-and-effect relationship - the decline resulted from disease taken in through bark weakened by dog urine.

How to prevent this kind of damage? Tree guards and tree fences keep dogs away from trunks. But, except for trees in certain locations, like village centers where trees are susceptible to swinging car doors, trampling feet and other insults, guards and fences are impractical. If done immediately, urine can be washed off bark and its effect on soil diluted with water. But it's enough to carry a pooper-scooper - even the most conscientious pet owners would resist carrying a pail of water to clean up after their dogs. Diet supplements intended to neutralize the acid in urine or reduce the nitrogen content are proven not to work.

The only known solution to this problem lies in the hands of dog owners: When on the leash, keep dogs away from trees, shrubs and other plants. When off-leash, train dogs to avoid trees and look for fire hydrants or other suitable objects for marking their territories. Our trees will be healthier for it.

Doug Dickson is a member and former chair of the Newton Urban Tree Commission.

Dog owners seek escape from leash law

By Andrew Lightman / Staff Writer
Tuesday, December 9, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/local_regional/new_covnedogpoogrms12092003.htm

Most days Robin Rouse takes her dog, Hazel, to run free and, well, do her business in the woods of Wellington and Norumbega parks. Now she'd like to do it legally.

Diligent as she is about cleaning up her dog's messes, as required by Newton's pooper-scooper law, Rouse and more than 100 other dog owners in the newly formed NewtonDogs organization are pushing to legalize off-leash dog walking.

Rouse has already been fined twice because police spotted Hazel off-leash in the Garden City. Now, NewtonDogs has asked for a time and place where dogs can run free.

"I want everyone to understand that Hazel poops whether off a leash or on it," said Rouse. "Are there irresponsible dog owners? You bet. But I shouldn't be punished because of them. There are irresponsible drivers and we're still allowed to drive."

Communities such as Brookline, Wellesley and Cambridge have set up different models to allow residents to take their dogs off leash. Newton's Board of Aldermen held a public hearing last week to explore interest in a similar plan for Newton., where many residents say they are forced to break the law to be good pet owners.

"It makes me sad that as a taxpayer, I have less rights than a resident of Cambridge or Wellesley or Brookline," said Rouse.

But Alderman Leonard Gentile quickly grew tired of Rouse's routine civil disobedience. Gentile lashed out at Rouse, the first resident to address the board, after she described her law-breaking experience.

Over a crowd of hissing dog owners, Gentile said he failed to see any humor in people breaking the law, "gleefully" taking then off leash into parks "where they crap all over where children go to play."

"I am not proud that I have constituents up here that are telling me that they are breaking the law," he said. "As your alderman, I can tell you that over my dead body will you be allowed to take your dog to a public park to poop and urinate where children play."

Alderman President Brooke Lipsitt also expressed concern with the potential health hazard from exposure to fecal matter on multi-use playing fields, and believes the risk goes up when leashes come off.

"When the owners are standing there drinking their coffee, they're not paying attention to where their dogs are relieving themselves," she said.

Both the police and health departments have also spoken out in opposition to giving dogs more free rein.

But not all communities near Newton agree that dogs off leash are a safety hazard.

In Wellesley, dogs can go off-leash in public parks, as long as owners keep them under verbal control, said Sue Webb, an animal control officer in Wellesley.

Brookline is also currently experimenting with an off-leash program of its own, said Nancy O'Connor, a Parks and Recreation commissioner in Brookline. They allow off-leash dog walking in Brookline at about half of the parks, excluding ones near schools and tot-lots. Hours are also limited from dawn until 7 a.m. to minimize interaction with small children, who could be at risk of attack.

And in Cambridge, residents can take their dogs to the Fresh Pond Reservation, the only place where unleashed dogs are allowed. The dogs have to stay under voice control and keep off the grass so owners can clean up after them more effectively.

Ann Dorfman, founder of NewtonDogs, said the majority of dog owners in Newton are respectful, and go out of their way to clean up the messes that their dogs make. She said often a responsible owner will even reprimand owners who don't follow the pooper-scooper law.

Dorfman said she and her fellow dog owners still will clean up, even if their dogs are allowed to run free.

"Put owning a dog and wanting to play with your dog on a same level as baseball. It's just another activity," she said. "I think we're asking for something very reasonable."

"It's already happening," she added. "I think what every person at [last week's] meeting wanted is what already exists. We're not asking for anything radically different. We just don't want to get ticketed."

Waban resident Stanley Riemer agrees.

"I am one of the many law-breakers," said Riemer. "It is a foolish law. I've seen people literally run into the woods to hide from the police."

"We need exceptions for people other than in little league, other than soccer," he added. "The dogs aren't the citizens. We are a large group of citizens who are forming a large group and getting active."

Andrew Lightman can be reached at andrew.lightman@cnc.com.

Letter:  Dog owners, not dogs, should be held accountable

Tuesday, December 16, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letneallf12162003.htm

Your recent TAB article ["Dog owners seek escape from leash law," Dec. 10] compelled me to opine. I am apolitical but this issue is very troubling. Alderman Leonard Gentile is clearly out of touch with a large segment of the Newton constituency. His comment that unleashed dogs "crap all over where children play," is particularly ignorant. Where do dogs on leashes "do their business:? The point being that it is the dog owner, not the leash, or lack thereof, that determines the remnants of the visit.

I was fortunate to have a dog for over 11 years. I often brought her to a Newton park daily/weekly and let her run off her leash. All the dog owners cleaned up after their pets. If someone did not, they were requested to do so. Any unfriendly or poorly behaved dogs were asked to leave. I brought my two children with me and they ran the same fields as the dogs. I never once feared for their safety or worried about the dogs relieving themselves where my children ran.

Socializing my dog with other dogs and children made her a better family pet and a better dog to our neighborhood. Sometimes, she would escape our yard and roam the neighborhood. Because of her "free range" experience, she never was a threat to the public.

There are plenty of fields in Newton that are rarely used by the general public. It would be a simple matter to designate certain fields for leash-free "dog time." Other affluent and enlightened communities provide this opportunity for their taxpayers. Newton can and should follow suit.

Again, it is the pet owner, not the leash, that permits a mess to be left.

As stated before, I am the least politically active person I know, but responsible pet owners should have some rights!

Barbara Friedfertig
Forest Avenue

Letter: Gentile 'willing to make the ultimate sacrifice' over dogs

Tuesday, December 16, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letneallb12162003.htm

Throughout the history of this country, some of our leaders have been called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice for their beliefs. It is nice to know that Alderman Gentile is willing to make that same sacrifice to prevent Newton from being defiled with dog poo. I am sure that the men and women fighting the war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq will be comforted to know that Alderman Gentile is also willing to make a sacrifice.

At age 25 I had a half dozen top secret clearances and literally the keys to the nukes. I find it hard to believe that at age 59, I am not responsible enough to clean up after my dog.

Scott Freedland
Walnut Hill Road

Letter: 'Try to meet halfway' over leash law

Tuesday, December 16, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letnealld12162003.htm

I am trying to understand why dog owners have such a problem obeying the leash laws and get so angry when the laws are being enforced. Realizing that they love their animals, I wonder if they have any consideration for small children who are often knocked over by running dogs and sometimes attacked. Do they know that there are some people who do not share their love and are also frightened by running and jumping dogs. I agree with Alderman Gentile that the mess created by urinating and "pooping" is a health hazard on playgrounds.

Some communities have set aside fenced in areas where dogs may run free, such as at Larz Anderson Park in Brookline, and that should be considered in Newton as well. It would be nice if we would try to understand each other's problems and try to meet halfway. Considering the mess the world is in, this should be one problem we could easily solve with a little bit of goodwill from everyone.

Irene S. Hofstein
Seminary Avenue

Letter: 'Dog poop everywhere' at Cold Spring Park


Tuesday, December 16, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letnealle12162003.htm

According to Ann Dorfman, "most dog owners are respectful and go out of their way to clean of their dog's messes." ["Dog owners seek escape from leash law," Dec. 10]. If that is so, why is it that when I go to Cold Spring Park, I can't take my eyes off the ground as I walk because there is so much dog poop everywhere? Similarly, the aqueduct that runs through Newton seems to be an area that dog owners consider an acceptable place to leave their dogs' droppings. Also, many dog owners seem to think that the snow replaces the need to pick up. Perhaps if the dog owners of Newton started being more vigilant about cleaning up after their dogs, whether on or off the leash, their wishes would be more likely to be granted.

Susan Cammer
Waban Avenue

Letter: How to join Newtondogs

Tuesday, December 16, 2003, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letneallc12162003.htm

Last week's article about efforts to revise Newton's leash-law did not mention how dog owners that want to join Newtondogs can reach us. At the moment we are mostly a "virtual" group that communicates through an e-mail newsgroup. Anyone that is interested in joining the group or being kept informed about progress can visit our Web site at www.newtondogs.org or send an email to newtondogs@yahoo.com requesting that their e-mail address be added to our newsgroup.

The next meeting of Newtondogs will be held in early January (possibly Monday, January 12). The time and place has not yet been finalized, but it will be posted on our website as soon as it is confirmed.

People that do not have email can contact newtondogs c/o Ann Dorfman, 9 Henshaw Street, West Newton, 02465.

Ann Dorfman

City needs to change leash laws

By Robin Rouse / Guest Commentary
Monday, December 22, 2003
Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_colnerousems12222003.htm


When our family adopted a tiny, eight-pound puppy from the Taunton Animal Rescue, we vowed to do everything necessary to give her a happy, healthy life. We never dreamed she would turn into a 75-pound fetch-a-holic with a tennis ball addiction that needs to be fed daily.

Now, 6:30 every morning finds me or my husband at the neighborhood park, throwing that ball and socializing with our friends in an ad hoc "puppy playgroup." It's an idyllic routine that seemed a perfect fit in family-friendly Newton.

My first $25 ticket was a rude awakening.

Even more startling, my crime - allowing my dog to run off-leash in the park - is or will be perfectly legal in most if not all of our surrounding communities, including Wellesley and Brookline.

That's why I am seeking a specific, limited change in our city's leash laws. And here, I speak only for myself, not on behalf of NewtonDogs or other dog owners in Newton.

I propose that all the existing laws pertaining to dogs should stay in place, including current leash laws, pooper-scooper laws, and laws that prohibit dogs on tot lots or school playgrounds.

City Ordinances, Chapter 3, Article II, Section 3-26, would be amended under the section named Prohibition. My one-sentence addition is in italics below [the bracketed areas would be up to the city and a citizens' task to designate].

"Prohibitions: No person owning or harboring a dog shall suffer or allow it to run at large in any of the streets or public places in the city. No person owning or harboring a dog shall allow it upon the premises of anyone other than the owner or keeper of such dog without the permission of the owner or occupant of the premises. No dog shall be permitted in any street or public place within the city unless it is effectively restrained by a chain or leash not exceeding ten (10) feet in length, with the following exception: A dog may be off-leash in non-playground areas of city parks from dawn until 10 a.m. and dusk until park closing, and at any time in [three] designated [fenced-in] "dog" areas of [TBD] parks as long as the dog is under the control and supervision of the dog owner at all times."

It still would be illegal to open your door and let your dog run loose, and it still would be a crime not to pick up after your dog. The law will still have teeth for those whose dogs bother or attack other animals or people. Critics have complained that free-roaming dogs leave unwelcome messes in parks, but here's a bulletin: Dogs on leashes do that, too. It's a problem solved by considerate owners and enforcement of the current pooper-scooper laws, not by leash laws. The regulars at our park are quick to remind the uninitiated that it's their responsibility to clean up after their dogs. However, like me, most people do not go to the parks specifically to have their dogs "do their business;" Hazel can do that on our walks or in our back yard. Like other dog owners in Newton, I just want some healthy exercise and the chance for relaxed socialization with friends - for myself and my dog.

Those who are concerned about aggressive dogs and dog feces must understand that those issues are separate from the leash laws. If Hazel poops in a park or on someone else's property and I do not pick it up, I am in violation of the pooper-scooper law, not the leash law.

The ticket I received from Newton Police was not because Hazel was running feral through the streets of Newton, nor because I was leaving her mess in a public place, nor because she attacked any other dog or person. The ticket I got was for allowing Hazel to chase a tennis ball at 7 a.m. in an otherwise abandoned park. I just don't see the crime in that.

Newton lags behind almost all other cities and towns with similar economic and educational demographics. An off-leash policy like the one I propose works in Wellesley, Brookline, Cambridge, Arlington, Wayland and many other towns. There's no reason it can't work in Newton.

And I hope that as this discourse continues, the rude and disrespectful comments such as those directed at me during the Dec. 3 meeting would be stifled in favor of a conversation that grants everyone the dignity and respect they deserve.

Owning a dog has, is, and will always be part of American and Newton life. I believe the solution I propose works for everyone who enjoys Newton's public parks, whether they own a dog or not.

Robin Rouse is a West Newton resident and member of NewtonDogs.

Off-leash hours

By Michael Coyne / Correspondent
Wednesday, January 14, 2004, Brookline Tab
http://www.townonline.com/brookline/news/local_regional/bt_covbrdogsms01142004.htm


A new leash on life

Despite weather that would have made a Siberian husky shiver, dozens of canines from across town gathered at the Brookline Avenue Playground on Saturday to help kick off the town's new Green Dog Off-Leash Program.

The program, which was approved at Town Meeting in May 2003, allows owners to exercise their dogs unleashed at designated parks during specified off-leash hours. The Park and Recreation Commission voted in November to approve a plan designating parks and hours for the pilot program, which officially went into effect Jan. 1.

"I think it's great," said Sarah Morton, who watched Pepper, her 10-month-old black Labrador retriever, run across the field. "He has so much energy, taking him for a walk sometimes isn't enough. This will definitely help."

Off-leash hours, which are subject to change until June 2005 when the pilot program expires, are now allowed at about half of the town's parks.

Specific parks and off-leash hours were selected following five public meetings when the Park and Recreation Commission heard from concerned citizens.

"We received input from dog owners and non-dog owners regarding locations and hours. We also made sure to include parks that are accessible to all neighborhoods in Brookline," said Erin Chute, Parks and Open Space director.

One park that will not be allowing off-leash hours is Dane Park on Hammond Street. The Friends of Dane Park registered multiple concerns about having unleashed dogs, ranging from safety issues related to broken glass in the park, to reservations about how dog owners would clean up after their pets in the park's wooded sections.

Litter in the town's parks concerns Morton as well. "Dogs will chew on anything. Plastic bottles, old food wrappers. People, not just dog owners, need to pick up after themselves, too."

Although Brookline Police will enforce the new off-leash bylaw, the Park and Recreation Commission is asking dog owners to help self-police the park.

"I think dog owners will keep an eye on each other to make sure that their dogs are under control, they're leashing them when they're supposed to and, most importantly, cleaning up after them," said Chute.

Those who fail to comply with the new off-leash hours or do not clean up after their dog will face a $50 fine.

The following parks now have off-leash hours from dawn to 9 a.m.: Daniel F. Ford Playground at Emerson Garden; Mary Robinson Playground; Corey Hill Park; Coolidge Playground; and Lotta Bradburn Schick Park.

The following parks have off-leash hours from dawn to 1 p.m.: Amory Playground; Griggs Park; Harry Downes Field; Soule Recreation Center; Jean Waldstein Playground; and Daniel J. Warren Playground.

The following two parks also have off-leash hours from dawn to 1 p.m. from April through November, and dawn to dusk from December through March: Larz Anderson Park (top of the hill area, Avon Street side only); and Brookline Avenue Playground.


Rules and Regulations

  • Only in parks where an official "Green Dog" sign is displayed may an owner exercise his or her dog off-leash during specified hours.

  • Posted off-leash hours are suspended when a playground is being used for permitted or school-based special events.

  • There are no off-leash hours when areas are saturated from rain.

  • Dogs must be leashed when the Park Department crews are working in the parks.

  • You are personally liable for any damages or injury your dog inflicts or receives.

  • Dogs must wear a collar with identification at all times, be licensed and vaccinated, healthy (have no contagious conditions or diseases), and be parasite-free.

  • Dogs in heat are not allowed off-leash.

  • Dogs are not allowed in playground areas, sand boxes and/or hard and clay courts.

  • Dogs must not chase or disturb wildlife or enter sanctuaries or sensitive open spaces (such as gardens).

  • Dogs must be leashed prior to entering and leaving the off-leash area.

  • Owners must have a leash visible at all times.

  • Dogs must be at least 4 months old to be allowed off-leash.

  • The number of dogs per person is limited to three.

Brookline Dogs No Longer Treated "Ruff"

By Jeremy Wahlman
January 15, 2004
Brookline Bulletin

They came wearing sweaters, coats, and mittens-and so did their owners.

Brookline's dogs braved the bitter cold Saturday morning to kick off the Green Dog Program at the Brookline Avenue Playground. The program, which has been in the works since the May 2003 Town Meeting, sets aside specific times for dogs and their owners to enjoy some leash-free exercise.

"It's going to help the parks," said Anne Gelbspan, who brought her dog, Marcus to the event.

While the playground near her home is not one of the participating parks, Geldspan said she would take advantage of the Green Dog Program on a daily basis.

Vera Wilkerson was excited about the program, but reminded dog owners to act responsibly.

"When people assume full responsibility and...understand how dogs see the world...it's rather easy to develop your dog into a well adjusted dog, making them a partner you're proud to be with," she said.

Wilkerson runs "The Pet Needs Company," a Beacon Street business that specializes in dog training. She said she plans to take her dog, Szap, to all of the different parks participating in the Green Dog Program.

Many at the kick-off event were impressed by the behavior of the nearly two-dozen dogs in attendance.

"I was amazed at how well behaved all the dogs were," said Regina Frawley. "I couldn't believe it. I've been around dogs a lot and it's like they had been given manner training."

Many dog owners take pride in the behavior of both their dogs and their peers.

"I pick up litter when I'm in the park," said Deidre Buckley, who brought her dog, Moose, to the kick-off.

Certain two-legged creatures are not always so clean.

"After a football game you'll see tons of Gatorade bottles," Buckley said. "Everyone should clean up after themselves."

Wilkerson, who has found everything from clothing to water bottles during her walks, agrees. "If you pick up your [dog's] poop, pick up something else," she recommended.

There are, or course, some rules and regulations that come along with the privilege to set your dog free. Dogs must be cleaned up after and kept under verbal control at all times. They must stay away from playground areas and basketball courts, and must be licensed and vaccinated. Dog owners should also be aware of small children in the area-both for the child's safety and that of the dog.

"The onus [for taking care of a dog] is on the owner," Wilkerson said. "It would be a shame if people couldn't go out and enjoy their dogs and enjoy the outdoors."

"If people are responsible, then the non-dog-owning public can see that it can work," Wilkerson said. "It's always up to us to do what's right."

Since the Green Dog Program has pilot status, it is due to come back up for a vote in June 2005.

Parks allowing dogs to be off-leash from dawn to 9 a.m. are the Danielf F. Ford Playground at Emerson Garden, the Mary E. Robinson Playground, Corey Hill Park, Coolidge Playground and Lotta Bradburn Shick Park.

Amory Playground, Griggs Park, Harry Downes Field, Soule Recreation Center, Jean Waldstein Playground and Daniel J. Warren Playground all allow off-leash dogs from dawn until 1:00 p.m.

The Brookline Avenue Playground and Larz Anderson Park (the top of the hill on the Avon Street side only) allow off-leash dogs from dawn to dusk December through March, and from dawn until 1:00 p.m. from April through November.

For more information on the Green Dog Program, contact the Brookline Park and Recreation Commission at (617) 730-2069.

Web Note: A map of Brookline's open space can be found online at http://www.townofbrooklinemass.com/conservation/OpenSpaceMap.html. Brookline GreenSpace Alliance also has a brochure with a printed version of the map. Call 617-277-4777 or e-mail bgsa@world.std.com

Thinking sensibly about off-leash dog parks

By Amy Koel / Guest Commentary
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
Newton Tab

Discussing off-leash dog parks raises people's hackles. We should think sensibly about it. I train dogs, own two (who are not suitable for most OLDPs), and am a developmental psychologist. I have two children in the Newton Schools and they play in parks frequented by dogs.

For small, stable groups of compatible dogs that know each other, OLDPs are good for dogs and their owners. They are great sources of canine fun and socialization, a convenient way for owners to exercise their dogs and promote meaningful friendships between owners. In varied parks in Newton, informal groups of people gather for off-leash play. They want to be legalized. Wanting this, even intensely, does not necessarily mean it should happen. However, Newton has a history of promoting the well-being of varied groups of citizens. Satisfying this constituency in a way that makes living in Newton more enjoyable for all seems commendable and possible. The alternatives seem to be: retaining the status quo (which is not working well and is not satisfying for many) or rigorously enforcing off-leash play policies (creating more conflict).

Are OLDPs good for the general population? They could be. By regulating and controlling off-leash play, the city could satisfy dog owners and simultaneously benefit others. It won't necessarily be easy; this issue breeds strong opinions.

Safety is the prime consideration. Unleashed dogs can be frightening. Dogs sometimes jump up on available, upright humans and some chase joggers, bikers and children. People have been bitten by unleashed dogs. Unleashed dogs can be hazardous in dog parks or on the street. Opponents of OLDPs fear that their establishment would raise the population of unleashed dogs, thus increasing risk and incidents. How do we keep unleashed dogs and people separate? We might designate enclosed parks for dogs only. This would work if parks are convenient to different neighborhoods and affordable for the city. Alternatively, we might designate hours when unleashed dogs are excluded and hours when they are permitted. Dogs should be healthy and licensed. Dogs should be allowed off-leash only when inside the park - not exiting and entering where they are more likely to meet pedestrians. Voice control is desirable, but rarely is achieved absolutely. Temperament, often overlooked, is also critical. (My neighbor's Lab does not always come immediately, but she is well-trained, delightful and never a danger or a nuisance.) Any dog with a history of people or dog aggression should not participate. (I mean real dog-dog aggression, not the growly incidents that happen when dogs quarrel.)

Dog owners also must be wary. When OLDP membership is large and/or unstable, they can be hazardous places. I have consulted with dog-park participants in neighboring communities. Some were owners whose dogs had been physically or psychologically traumatized. Others were distraught because their dogs attacked other dogs. I have seen puppies become dog aggressive overnight because of frightening experiences with adult dogs. These are terrible places to socialize puppies.

Another issue is poop. The bad news is that dogs poop - whether playing in parks or walking on streets. Poop is more problematic in parks where people, particularly children, play. Although disgusting, it is not a major threat, say the pediatricians I've questioned. They don't see canine zoonotic illnesses in their practices. However, public health officials remind us that dog poop can carry disease and is a problem when deposited near storm drains or rivers. The good news is that we can do something about dog poop. Organized groups of owners generally are responsible and remind others. I see more piles on the sidewalks near my home than in the neighborhood's parks. Along with the privilege of having OLDPs, we might make clean parks mandatory. All poop goes, or the park becomes off-limits, not off-leash. (Maybe we could have a pilot project - a poop-free park.) Cleaner, more pleasant parks would benefit everyone. What should we do about random irresponsible dog owners - other than wishing they'd go away? We remind them, offer help (bags) and, if that does not work, embarrass them as much as possible. An empowered population might make a real difference.

We need institutionalized, city-wide mechanisms for educating and monitoring. Offering an educational component to all Newton residents might be useful and reassuring. Peer pressure to maintain clean and safe parks often works; dog owners can be intense. However, some individuals need pressure from a higher authority. For planning and for oversight, a board with membership from varied, involved and interested constituencies should be established as a first step. It might be a beginning and the best alternative.

Amy Koel lives in Newton Corner.

A push to throw the dogs a ban

By Andrew Lightman / Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 7, 2004, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/local_regional/new_covnedogparkgrms04062004.htm

While some Newton residents are urging the Board of Aldermen to let their dogs run free, others are hounding the city to keep dogs out of parks, playgrounds and anywhere else children might play.

Auburndale resident Ken Lavin hosted an open forum at City Hall last week to talk about the health and safety concerns posed by dogs. From his house near the old Warren School playground, Lavin said he frequently sees people take their dogs off-leash, and he doesn't like it.

"When I go to the park outside my house, I can't enjoy the experience because of the dogs," said Lavin. "I walk in the park. There's dog poop everywhere. It's not a pleasant experience."

Lavin is calling for the city to ban dogs, on leash or off, in all the city's playgrounds, parks and recreation areas. Instead, Lavin proposes designating as many as three spaces to fence in and keep as dog-only.

That way, he said, children will never be scared by dogs illegally off-leash in their parks and won't be exposed to the hazards of dog feces.

"When you play baseball, softball, football, you don't wear latex gloves," said Lavin. "I don't think anyone would want their children or themselves to be playing in that."

About a half-dozen people showed up at the meeting in support of Lavin's cause. One woman, Wendy Zarnick, said she came because her 8-year-old son is so afraid of the loose dogs that he refuses to go to the park.

"It's just such a shame," she said. "I do believe dogs need to be on leashes. An unleash law would be terrible."

In Newton, residents are required to keep their dogs on leashes when out in public, and can be fined up to $50 if they are not. Residents are also required to clean up after their dogs.

But with dozens of parks and open spaces for residents to set their pets loose, police say it's not realistic to expect the law will always be enforced.

"It's an impossible task for the animal control officer to monitor these areas on a regular basis," said Capt. Alex Sbordone.

Meanwhile, members of NewtonDogs, the organization that is lobbying the city to allow some off-leash time for pets, say Lavin's concerns are overblown.

NewtonDogs member Susan Sullivan attended Lavin's meeting and noted that the city isn't concerned with waste from cats and squirrels which also roam Newton's streets.

But David Naparstek, Newton's health commissioner, said he's getting pressure from both sides of the dog issue. He said he wants aldermen to understand the potential hazards of allowing dogs off-leash when they make a decision.

"Certainly I do have a concern about dogs off-leash and kids playing in the same area," he said.

Ann Dorfman, founder of NewtonDogs, said her group would gladly work to eliminate those situations. Dorfman said allowing residents to bring their dogs to play off-leash in the early morning hours, before children go to school, is one way to do that.

That model is in effect in Brookline, which allows off-leash dog walking in parks, excluding ones near schools and tot-lots. But the hours are also limited from dawn until 7 a.m. to minimize interaction with small children who could be at risk of attack.

"We want to work with the city. We want to identify what the problem areas are," said Dorfman. "But there are areas where dogs and children don't have a problem."

Alderman Leonard Gentile, however, believes dog owners who already break the law and unleash their dogs will likely break the off-leash hours too.

"I'm dead set against off-leash hours," he said. "There are some people who feel their dog is the cat's meow and let them jump up on people."

Gentile said he would prefer creating a dog park, giving residents a place to exercise their pets at all hours.

Still, other aldermen say the idea of setting up a dog park will be messy, sparking neighborhood opposition wherever it is proposed.

The problem with having separate parks, said Alderman and dog owner Christine Samuelson, is that people who live near the parks won't want the intrusion of cars into their neighborhood.

"You know the first thing I'm going to hear? 'Not in my back yard,'" agreed alderman Anthony Salvucci. "Maybe we should put them on a barge in the ocean."

Samuelson also said people won't want to get in a car to drive across the city when they may have a park in their neighborhood.

"I don't want to see two dog parks," she said. "I think we need to find a way to share areas."

Lavin, meanwhile, said the aldermen need to do something soon.

"All parks are basically de facto off-leash parks," he said. "The status quo in certainly not acceptable for the majority of people in Newton."

Andrew Lightman can be reached at andrew.lightman@cnc.com.

Letter: NewtonDogs should help enforce laws


Wednesday, April 21, 2004, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letnealli04202004.htm

We have a leash law in Newton, though you would not know it from where I live. There is a two-acre park bounded by Arnold, Meadowbrook and Country Club Road. On an average day some 45 to 50 dog trips are made to the park. Many are allowed to run free while the owners sit in their cars or stand on the edge of the park. At best only half the dogs are on a leash and even less than that do the owners clean up after.

The first three feet into the park has most of the "poop." Oh sure, there are the owners that carry the plastic bags ... the same bag every day with a few rocks in it. Some swing scoopers .... that are never used. And then there is the lady from Cross Hill Road that "scoops the poop" with a little garden shovel and gently drops it into the storm drain, a no-no.

In the summer on a hot day you'd think you were down on the pig farm. But, don't dare confront a dog owner .... Yet, there is an intelligent compromise.

If the "NewtonDogs" group were to take on the responsibility of public education and implementation of the laws that we now have and their proposed new "off-leash" law then they would have my support. First, make the new off-leash law year to year. Then the "NewtonDogs" group could establish a mailing address, or e-mail address, or telephone number where we could advise the identification, address or auto license plate number of those who choose not to adhere to the leash laws. The "NewtonDog" group could advise the offenders with a mailer or diplomatic phone call that their cooperation would be appreciated and would ensure the renewal each year of the more liberal law they seek.

The other alternative is to have the mayor appoint another "doggone" committee.

Joseph H. Perkins
Country Club Road

Letter: Pet owners leave bags in parks

Wednesday, April 21, 2004
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letnecammer04202004.htm

Perhaps the dogs are picked up after in the Newton parks, but in my neighborhood along the aqueduct in Waban, the job is only half done. Plastic bags heavy with dog poop are adorning low tree branches where evidently they were left blowing in the breeze and forgotten. Beautiful.

Susan Cammer
Waban Avenue

Editorial: Wethinks they think too much

Wednesday, April 28, 2004, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_edinedogsms04272004.htm


Two parks, or not two parks. That is the question.

Whether it's better in minds of aldermen to let
Dogs run free in parks at certain times;
Or to pick parks amongst a garden city,
And within fences, free them: to run, to play, off-leash.

And by off-leash, to say they end
The heartache and constant law-breaking
That owners must abide. It's a consummation
They must no doubt wish.

To end, to solve. To solve, perchance to free.
Aye, there's the rub. For in that release of dogs,
What hazards may come,
when they have shuffled off this sacred leash.
It must give them pause.

That's the respect that makes worry for aldermen:
For who would face the votes and scorn of the harmed?
"The city is wrong," the proud residents taunt.

The pangs of poor decision, delays the law.
The indolence of office, and the spurns
That delegating fair judgment takes,
When they themselves have resolution to make.

Give a finite answer? Who would bear that role?
Some grunt and sweat facing a weary truth -
But that the dread of something after choice,
The undiscovered outcome, from whose aftermath
No politician returns, puzzles their will.

And makes us rather bear those ills we have,
Than be faced with a choice we know not of.

This conscience does make cowards of them all,
And thus the dream of resolution
Is marred over by this pale cast of thought,
And discussions of great pitch and movement.

With this regard the board has gone awry,
Lost in a game of inaction...

Board snarling over K9 debate

By Andrew Lightman / Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 28, 2004, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/local_regional/new_covnedogsms04272004.htm

Taking its first bite at solving Newton's leash law problems Wednesday night, the Board of Aldermen split into packs of dog park-backers and off-leash hour supporters.

Under city law, it's illegal to have a dog off-leash, and those caught with unleashed dogs in public can be fined up to $50.

But recently, a group of Newton residents has petitioned the board's Programs and Services Committee to create legal off-leash options for dog owners.

On one side of the committee's debate Wednesday night were aldermen Marcia Johnson and Ted Hess-Mahan, who want to create specific times when dog owners can exercise their dogs off-leash.

Hess-Mahan said he prefers regulating times, rather than places for dogs to play, because it would let people enjoy their neighborhood parks. Johnson went a step further, saying many dog owners are currently unable enjoy Newton's parks the same way that baseball or soccer players do.

"I think we need to be open-minded because even though you may be against off-leash, you are disenfranchising a group of your constituents that vote for you," said Johnson. "We have people that can't do what they want to do."

Meanwhile, several aldermen touted the benefits of designating a pair of dog parks in Newton.

Alderman Paul Coletti suggested the board choose two locations, one of them possibly occupying the city's Victory Garden (otherwise known on city maps as Infirmary Land or Vegetable Kingdom) behind the Jewish Community Center. Isolated from neighborhoods, the site has ample parking and open space, Coletti said.

That sort of plan, agreed Alderman Lisle Baker, might encourage dog owners to keep their dogs leashed when in neighborhood parks, once they have a legal off-leash option.

But even as Coletti touted the dog park idea, he had doubts about whether it would work.

"I can't imagine people would put dogs in their cars and drive four miles or so," said Coletti.

Alderman Mitchell Fischman, meanwhile, said neighbors of a proposed dog park would likely protest, as they did when the city explored building a skateboard park.

"I don't see an easy solution," said Fischman.

Another idea, raised by Alderman Christine Samuelson, would form a commission on dogs, which will listen to the positive and negative things people have to say about dogs in Newton, as a way to lessen perceived tensions.

"There's clearly conflicts going on in the parks, and I don't care what area of the city you live in," said Samuelson.

Her idea, however, was not well received in committee.

"I'm not going to duck the responsibility and say 'we have a dog commission that meets every third Thursday'," said Carelton Merrill.

Merrill, who has previously said he opposes changing the current leash law, said the city really needs to teach dog owners to keep their dogs leashed.

Johnson, however, took the opposite stance.

"These people are disenfranchised," Johnson said. "People know there's a leash law. We don't need to educate them."

Andrew Lightman can be reached at andrew.lightman@cnc.com

Three eye open board seat

By Andrew Lightman / Staff Writer
Wednesday, April 28, 2004, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/local_regional/new_covnewardgrms04272004.htm

(note: this article discusses the candidates' positions on the off-leash issue)

Three weeks before the May 18 special election to fill an open seat on the Board of Aldermen, candidates Benjamin Pushner, Victoria Danberg and Dennis Maguire are vying for your vote.

All three hope to replace Susan Basham, who left for California in January, as a Ward 6 alderman-at-large.

With the three candidates in agreement about many of the major city issues - such as Newton North, the Community Preservation Act and protecting the city's neighborhoods from traffic and development - voters may have to choose candidates that differ less in substance and more in style.

Maguire, a lifelong Newton resident who owns a local plumbing company, has been an alderman before. Twice, in fact, before he moved out of his ward in 1999 and had to resign his post.

Because of his past experience, Maguire said he can step right in after the election and get to work.

"My decision-making is required to be level headed and pragmatic," he said. "My experience on the board, I believe, is the same."

Danberg, meanwhile, moved to Newton in 1977, where she manages her husband's dental practice.

Though active in the Newton Historical Society and the Newton Schools Foundation, this election would be Danberg's first.

"I would bring some very fresh perspective to the Board of Aldermen," Danberg said.

If elected, Danberg said she would work to protect Newton's neighborhoods from encroaching traffic and development. Drawing on her business experience, including time spent helping bring Chelsea out of receivership, she also believes she can help make the most of the city's limited resources, given tough financial realities.

"We need someone in this town with good progressive values," said Danberg. "We need to look at what resources we have and what to do with them."

Pushner is the newest candidate to Newton, having moved to the Garden City five years ago. An attorney for the Hartford Insurance Company, Pushner will have two children enrolled at Bowen in the fall.

"I'm someone who likes there to be consensus," he said. "I am an idealist, but I would like there to be pragmatic approaches."

But Pushner admitted that he doesn't see much of a difference between himself and the other candidates.

"I'm really heartened by what my fellow candidates say," said Pushner. "Looking at the three of us, the voters can't go wrong."

"I think really, from my perspective, whomever the voters go for, I am going to be very comfortable," he said.

Top priorities

Both Maguire and Danberg agree that working on the Newton North project will be their top priority while in office, while Pushner says his would be the entire school system.

As a former chairman of the board's Public Facilities Committee, Maguire said he drew on his professional experience in construction to read blueprints, and scrutinize the building and renovation process.

That skill, said Maguire, will be even more valuable when the school project comes before the board. Maguire also said the city should bring in a design review committee into the process, instead of relying on information given to them by Turner Construction, the project's management company.

Danberg said she would also put the Newton North project through unprecedented scrutiny if she were elected, "because we had some real problems with the building and the functioning of the old Newton North."

Though she wants the school to be an architectural jewel for Newton, Danberg said the city also needs to build a school that lasts.

"We have got to get it right this time," she said.

Pushner, meanwhile, views the entire school system as his top priority.

"With everything going on in the community, we find our city under attack," he said.

Pushner added that keeping the CPA is another one of his priorities, because of its value in preserving open space and historical resources.

What to do about dogs

If elected, Pushner said he wouldn't vote to relax the city's leash law. Pushner said he's also against building dog parks because it would make life difficult for those who live near the parks and for those who would then have to drive to walk their dogs.

"If we keep the leash law as is, I think in the long run it's going to have the best results," he said.

But Danberg, who owns a blind dog which she said she would never take off-leash, is open to easing up on the city's leash laws.

"I would like to see the mitigation of the leash law," she said, because it would be nice to let responsible dog owners let their dogs "have a place to run around."

However, Danberg said any off-leash areas could not be put near schools or tot lots. Instead, Danberg favors a pilot program, similar to Brookline's, that would set up specific dog hours at certain city parks.

"I think that would be a good way of testing the waters and getting a win-win," she said.

Maguire, another dog owner, agrees. Though he said he keeps his dog on leash, he said he also wants to allow dogs off-leash in some trial locations, away from schools and tot lots.

Wednesday, April 28, is the last day to register to vote in the May 18 election. The Election Commission will be open until 8 p.m. today. For further information, contact 617-796-1350.

Andrew Lightman can be reached at andrew.lightman@cnc.com

Letter: 'Unfortunate' that city must have leash laws

Wednesday, April 28, 2004, Newton Tab
http://www.townonline.com/newton/news/opinion/new_letneh04272004.htm

You had a letter in the April 14 issue from a woman said that she walks her dog off-leash, and that people complain when her dog urinates on their bushes. Her plan was to move "eventually" to another town, since this was clearly Newton's fault.

Yesterday we found that a large dog had run through and trampled many of the tulips along our driveway, which were just in the budding stage. We could have planted those tulips in our backyard, where they are more visible to us, but planted them in the front of the house for the enjoyment and pleasure of passersby, and to make the neighborhood a more cheerful and attractive place.

Some people seem to forget that they live in a community and that, rather than thinking only of themselves, they have an obligation to respect the rights of others. That obligation might well include keeping a dog on a leash in a settled area. It is unfortunate that it was necessary to have a law to have people do things that should be a matter of common courtesy.

Martin Frant
Westchester Road

newtondogs@yahoo.com

Home | About Us | News | Off-Leash | Info | Contact Us | Site Map